The announcement of the end of The Cimmerian Blog represents a real blow to Howard, Tolkien, and fantasy fandom. Initially an extension of the webpage Leo Grin had created for his superb REH journal, the blog has been, for the past five years, the most consistently entertaining and informative website for the Howard fan. We will carry on with the REHupa blog, of course (and by “we” I mean mainly Morgan and Indy, but I’ll see if I can’t up my own frequency a bit), and endeavor to expand our coverage of Howard happenings, and perhaps some of the TC contributors will join us here, or will hang out over at Damon Sasser’s REH: Two-Gun Raconteur blog (which, with sterling contributions of late from Rob Roehm and Brian Leno, as well as Damon himself, bids fair to assume TC‘s mantle) or at Black Gate, so Howard fans will still have sources of news and views in blog form. Still, TC‘s blog really stood out, in design, in format, in content, just a superb act.
The closing of the blog apparently also marks the exit, for now, of Leo Grin from Howardian affairs. This is a terrific loss. To my way of thinking, the towering figure in Robert E Howard fandom during the decade ending this year was Leo Grin. And I’m not just talking about his massive 6’8″ frame.
That The Cimmerian was the finest of the REH periodicals published during the decade there can be absolutely no argument. In my opinion, Leo raised the bar for the rest of us: The Dark Man and Two-Gun Raconteur, at least, were both better for having The Cimmerian out there. (In fact, The Cimmerian was probably an outgrowth of Leo’s short but memorable tenure on The Dark Man board of reviewers. His impassioned arguments for what a Howard journal should be not prompting the sort of action from the rest of us that he desired, Leo was inspired to go forth and create the periodical that he wanted.)
Not long after joining REHupa in late 1999, Leo took on the task of redesigning our website (originally developed by Ed Waterman and hosted by Rob Jones) and adding a lot of interesting and useful material. (See this page where he discusses some of the changes he was making. Many of the features of this website that we’ve grown accustomed to were Leo’s doing.) Some years later, after he had gotten The Cimmerian Blog going, he set up the REHupa blog and handed the keys to Morgan, Indy and me. So at least two REH websites owe him a tremendous debt — and unless I miss my guess, there are a couple of others that show his hand, too — or at least, the hand of people who learned from him.
Next week many of us will be arriving in Cross Plains for an event that also bears the strong imprint of Mr. Grin. Robert E Howard Days had been going for some years before Leo got involved, but he did a lot to elevate it to, as the saying goes, “the next level,” from a small, rather informal gathering of a few dozen fans to a well-organized program that draws hundreds. From the press-release-style announcements at the REHupa website, to the interesting and informative panels and presentations, to the Silent Auction benefitting Project Pride and the Howard House, and of course the presentation of annual awards, there is almost no aspect of Howard Days that does not bear the stamp of Leo’s imagination, hard work and dedication. I tried a few times to get Leo to take a bow, but he always backed away, preferring to keep his involvement in the background.
I fear that this encomium is veering toward hagiography, so I will mention but one more of Leo’s important contributions and then close. Largely (in my opinion) thanks to Leo’s prodding, cajoling, and other less savory forms of suasion, Robert E. Howard scholars started going public. I’d been trying for years to get people to contribute material to The Dark Man, with limited success. Leo, perhaps because he offered genuine cash American money for contributions, managed to actually get enough submissions to put out a regular zine. (The regularity part of the equation was helped tremendously by Leo’s incredible industry. His creation of The Cimmerian Awards also provided further incentive to publish one’s essays or research.) Those who never worked directly with him might not know what a skillful editor he is, with a real gift for shaping a writer’s material into something that is not only more entertaining than what was submitted, but thereby also more informative (for who really gets much information from something that is tedious to read?). Leo and I are of two different schools of editorial thought, both perfectly valid: I prefer to leave the writer’s work to the writer, for the most part, and confine myself to cleaning up grammatical and typographical errors (if other changes are needed, I like to just suggest to the writer where I think something needs to be reworked, and let him or her do it); Leo is of the more active school, ready to cut-and-paste, strike through, and rework, forging the raw material into something more forceful, direct and readable. Peppery and to the point. Mush-and-milk journalism gives him the fan-tods. He always gave me, and as far as I know all the other authors he worked with, ample opportunity to participate in all this rewriting and editing. For my part, though, I thought the changes he made to my work were always for the better. And it could be argued that Leo’s greatest editorial contribution to Howard Studies was to shepherd the work of Steve Tompkins, David Hardy, Rob Roehm, Brian Leno, Chris Gruber, Morgan Holmes, Barbara Barrett, Gary Romeo, and others into print, both in the journal and on the blog(s).
Okay, I said I’d end with that, but there’s one more thing: Leo’s own writing about Robert E. Howard forms a most valuable addition to Howard Studies. In his first REHupa zine, in mailing 160 back in December of 1999, Leo made a spirited defense of Howard’s work as being not altogether as grim and dark as many had averred, but as being also joyous and life-affirming. In his stories, Leo wrote, “combat is savage but a sense of joy for life and an unparalleled sense of humor shine through like a rainbow after a storm. Far from walking away from a Howard story depressed and morose, one is energetic and overwhelmed with energy and vibrancy. I cannot think of a story from another author sporting a so-called ‘happy ending’ that gives the same feeling of relishing the marrow of life, the thrill of living.” It was a refreshingly contrarian viewpoint, and of course he continued to demonstrate it over the next decade, in REHupa and both print and online TC. But it was not only contrarian — it was extraordinarily perceptive. Agree or not — heaven knows I have not always agreed with Leo’s arguments — his views are always based on solid research and backed by strong evidence. In my opinion, one of the most insightful and significant essays of the decade was Leo’s heartfelt “In Defense of Hester Jane Ervin Howard,” a much-needed corrective — or at least a challenge — to the decades of demonization REH’s mother has suffered.
Leo’s career in Howard fandom has not been an exceptionally long one, but it has been an exceptionally important one, with many, many contributions both public and private (let’s not forget his purchase of a copy of the Jenkins Gent from Bear Creek which he then gave to the Howard House) that have left us all considerably in his debt. I hope that the decision to pull the plug on The Cimmerian Blog will not mark the end of his involvement in Howard Studies. I certainly wish him the best as he pursues other writing opportunities and interests, but I am selfish enough to hope that he will still occasionally lob one of his contrarian theses our way. We will always be the richer for having a friend and colleague like Leo Grin.